.
The scene in today’s gospel is well represented in art and literature: a young Jewish woman, perhaps busy with morning routines, unexpectedly confronted with a messenger from God informing her that she was to become the mother of the “Son of the Most High. The Lord God will give him the throne of his ancestor David; he will rule over the House of Jacob for ever and his reign will have no end.”
I know I’ve used the image above before, but it remains one of my favourites. American artist Henry Ossawa Tanner (1859-1937), Mary, sensing God, flooded with light and awe, all ears.
Mary was puzzled, not resistant or dismissive, but curious: “But how can this be” she asked. The answer was clear: “nothing is impossible for God.”
Mary’s childhood (like ours) was spent within an environment formed by strong presumptions, expectations and limitations. Such cultural programmings are often formed by fear. Mary understood that God was calling her to greater love and she realised that this would involve letting go of the fears that provided an albeit superficial and fickle bond with her family, friends and the wider community.
The direct action of the Holy Spirit with Mary at the moment of her conception saved her from inherited (Original) sin, and enabled her to live (before Christian Baptism was instituted) the harmony and intimacy with God that we receive in the Sacrament of Baptism.
It is easy for us to ignore the opportunity that the grace of baptism offers us to live in relationship with God, each of us showing a unique and original dimension of the image of God.
But we don’t like to put our heads above the secular mentality.
Instead of becoming saints (which is our baptismal calling) we settle for an existence as photocopies, fitting the moulds, obeying the stereotypes, seeking tangible measures of success. When we do this our goals are uncreative.
Yet we laugh at the teenagers who plead for a mufti day at school so that they can have the freedom to dress however they choose, yet on the appointed day when they arrive at school they look remarkably uniform.
Perhaps we have never really understood that the stressed existence that most of us think is a normal part of life on earth is not the way things have to be. There is a way out, and it’s not about holding on until the weekend or hanging out for a pay increase or a change of boss.
And the great news is that this change is not only possible, it is available. Adam & Eve lost sight of the fact that they were dependant on God for their happiness and instead grasped at satisfaction that seemed promising but immediately disappointed.
It’s the story of our lives, isn’t it? Yet our experience tells us that this way of living is not really a life at all. It’s more of an existence never delivering what the depth of joy and peace the advertising and popular opinion promises.
And for us it can seem impossible to make any change. We’ve tried before and failed slipping back into the common mentality,
Today let’s notice the glimpses of hope-filled originality that are ours when we step aside from the crowds.
+++
Take an initiative and send me a date time and place for a FFF cafe-catchups john@fff.org.nz. I’ll advertise these on each morning’s post throughout Advent.
Wednesday 11 December 10.30am with Christina
Zenders Cafe and Venue
44 Hopkins Rd Newstead, Hamilton
Thursday 12 December 10.00am with Joan
Stumble Inn, 200 Mangorei Road
Merrilands, New Plymouth
Monday 16th December 11.00am with Gillian
Cypress Café 10 St Heliers Bay Road
St Heliers, Auckland
Tuesday 17 December 10.30 with Catherine
Colombus at Mitre 10 MEGA
25 Bouverie St, Petone, Lower Hutt.
Thursday 19 December 10.00am with Joan
Stumble Inn, 200 Mangorei Road
Merrilands, New Plymouth
That is a beautiful piece of artwork. The words that struck me today were the final sentence. That’s a very strong finish and I hope I can take note today.
We often hear the church articulate these ideals, but practical examples of what they mean are rarely provided. Most work six days a week, with many juggling two or three jobs just to make ends meet. By the time they get home, they are exhausted from the day and then have to manage the responsibilities of raising children alongside everything else. Many families struggle to keep a roof over their heads and food on the table, making homeownership feel like an unattainable dream. Typically, both parents need to work to support the family. So, how do they step away from this cycle in practical terms? Simply organizing the kids and getting to Mass is a significant challenge, especially if they have to also contend with work commitments. We no longer live in a society where Sunday is universally observed as a day of rest. Could these ideals be the reason our churches are emptying as people see them as unattainable and fill them with guilt?
With regard to expectations of avoidance of cloning, of “hope-filled originality” does the Church, consciously or not, follow the same lines as “But I …” and “But we …”? How many times in the past decade have I heard in conversation, “But I …” and “But we …”, as though what the speaker says is the only way, the answer, the truth, the only possible way of living, of coping with a situation. Those types of attempts at dialogue fail because they are about filling others with guilt. How original is the Church if it talks to us in that same way? Talking to us like that, is it listening?