moving forward in liturgy…

Nov 4, 2010

…with the wisdom and beauty of the past

After Sunday morning Mass last week, a parishioner made a comment that got me thinking. They said that they were happy that “I” had decided to introduce chant at Mass. They added that they were happy too with my decision to have incense at Mass.

While I would be happy to be credited with this, the introduction of chant and incense was not my idea.

I have also received some negative comments about the chant and incense. People say ‘why have you decided to make these changes…it’s not happening in other parishes?’ Some people go on to express their dissatisfaction that “I” decided not to have cd’s or Power Point in the Church, even at funerals. Once again this is not simply my decision. It was never intended or imagined by the Second Vatican Council, that churches would be a venue for slide-shows of granddad on the beach or mum in fancy-dress at a family party. The thought that one day a Catholic would be carried from his Funeral Mass accompanied by Frank Sinatra singing “I did it my way” was unimaginable in the mind of the Council.

The months since the restoration of our parish Church have happily coincided with the introduction of the new General Instruction of the Roman Missal and the Revised Order of the Mass. In just two weeks (28 November 2010, First Sunday of Advent) the church in New Zealand will receive the revised people’s prayers of the Mass. In these months we also take further steps to implement the new General Instruction.

In the almost fifty years since the Council, many changes have been made to the way we celebrate the Mass. Some of these changes were presented and encouraged by the Council. The increased use of the local language in the Mass (especially for the readings) is an example. However there are some other changes we have experienced that were never intended by the Council. An example is the movement away from use of scripture in the prayers and hymns of the Mass.

Another change that the bishops of the Council could never have imagined is the increased adapting and building of churches to be ‘multi-purpose-gathering-spaces’, where coffee is served, canned secular music is played and movies are shown.

In hindsight we can see that the life-giving documents of the Council landed in a western culture that (in the mood of the 1960’s) was all too ready to discard anything that reeked of “tradition”.

These were the years when our families put the oak dining table in the garage and saved up for formica and chrome. It looks more ‘modern’ we said, and ‘it’s easier to keep clean’.

The same was true of our culture and language. Immigrants were encouraged (ordered even) to abandon their own language and traditions, so that they could ‘settle’ and integrate in a new land. Even the first people of our own land were discouraged from speaking Maori. Such repression is not the mark of a healthy society.

But now we realize that we lost a lot when the oak went out. It wasn’t just the table we discarded. It was the reminder of our parents who ate every day at this battered heirloom, and the memory of our grandparents who received the table as a wedding present and who brought it with them from Ireland. Now we lovingly restore the antique table and design the rest of the room around it. In doing this we are not moving backwards. We are remembering that we are not ready to move into the future, unless we carry the wisdom and tradition of the past.

So too in the Church the time is ripe to maturely restore anything of value that has been lost. We realize again that the Liturgy of the Church is a gift to be received rather than a performance of our own creating. Two thousand years of Sacred Tradition is worth re-embracing.

This is not a backward movement, or a tripping on nostalgia. At Our Lady of Victories we are not following the whims of an innovative priest. Every change we have made, from the restoration of the church building, to the form of our celebration of the Liturgy, is clearly outlined as the norm in the Rites of the Church.

In worshipping in our parish church in harmony with the wider mind and heart of the Church, we provide for the people of our city, the sacred space and worship that the human soul seeks.

Please do not hesitate to call or email me for further clarification on this. I am also happy to meet with any group who would like to grown in appreciation of and understanding of the Liturgy of the Church.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts

on the journey

on the journey

Today’s palm branch procession, and reading of the passion of Jesus signals our move into Holy Week.
It is helpful to see these days before Easter as a week of retreat. While we continue our family and work routines, our focus is guided beyond.
In these days let us look together to Jesus.

yes to laughter

yes to laughter

I’ve been moving about a bit in recent weeks, across the country and further afield. I don’t enjoy the travel since planes are not designed for people of my height. But I love being with the people I end up with after a journey of any length.

the seduction

the seduction

Don’t get down when you hear today’s first reading.
Jeremiah is having a bad day. He’s a bit overwhelmed with the negative response he is getting when he passes God’s message to the people. In short, Jeremiah is having a Jeremiad.

I AM

I AM

I try not to repeat these daily Lenten posts year to year but there are times when the same scriptures pop up annually and I realise that I can’t write it better than I did last year. Today is one such day, not only because of the thought I share but even more in the comments that are added by FFF readers. Today I have left some of last year’s comments helping us to appreciate the power of today’s readings.

my word your home

my word your home

The heart of the home in years past was the hearth.
It was at the hearth that the family gathered for the warmth and light of the flame and the food that was prepared there.
The fire was treated with respect since the same flame which provided energy for the home could just as easily destroy it.